The victory at the presidential elections held on October 15 was won by the candidate of the ruling party “Yeni Azerbaijan,” the ruling president Ilham Aliev, who was ahead of the polling list gathering 89% of votes. It is noteworthy that almost all the opposition parties, none of which was at all an influential oppositionist in Azerbaijan, boycotted the elections.
The pre-election process in Azerbaijan was comparatively quiet. Perhaps the only exclusion was the explosion set off on August 17 during the evening prayer in the Sunni mosque Abu Bakir (Baku) as a result of which were killed and wounded many people. There was also wounded the mosque’s Imam Haji Hamet Suleymanov. The incident was unprecedented and was much voiced about. It is not by chance that the control of the case’s investigation was undertaken by Ilham Aliev in person. Later on, while congratulating the Islamic population of Azerbaijan on the occasion of the holiday to follow Ramadan, he was making attempts to announce that in Azerbaijan – an example of religious and ethnic tolerance – there aren’t any religious contradictions and there never were.
Some opinions were voiced in Azerbaijan in connection with terrorist acts performed in the mosque of certain Wahhabi orientation. According to the official version, the explosion was aiming at destabilizing social-political situation in the country on the threshold of presidential elections. Such an opinion was expressed by Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Commission on Defense and Security of Azerbaijan Aydin Mirzazade. In the explanation of Presidential Administration head Ramiz Mehtiyev there was a clear hint that the state would not put up with radicalization of Islamic religious-political streams. “We are not going to forbid Vakhabizm in the country, however, if the representatives of this or that religion… undertake radical stapes, their activity is sure to be limited in the framework of legislation.”
According to Azerbaijan’s spiritual leader Sheikh Allah Shukur Pasha Zade, the explosion was a result of contradictions between the two parties. According to another version, the terrorist act could have been organized by the adherents of radical Islam, who, in spite of their too little number in the country, struggle for making Azerbaijan an Islamic state. Besides, Hamet Suleymanov is known by its negative approaches to radical groupings, accordingly, the terrorist act could also be personified.
It is not excluded that contradictions among different flows in Azerbaijan are quite advantageous for the state itself which, as a rule, is expecting a proper time to suppress their activities. It is known that representatives of different Islamic flows (Including Wahhabists) are periodically persecuted and arrested. The activity of religious community, organizations and religious-political powers is under strict control of the state, which, at the same time, spares no efforts to hinder formation of political culture of Islam in the country.
According to the human rights advocate, former imam of Shiite Juma mosque (Baku) Ilghar Ibrahimoghlu, the Azerbaijani society is to consider the incident a strike at Azerbaijan’s spiritual and moral security, and, accordingly, it is a result of wrong interpretation of Islam in Azerbaijan and a threat to its security.
Islamologist Elmir Kuliev supposes that the incident in Abu Bakir mosque was an alarm making reconsider approaches to religious culture in Azerbaijan. He thinks that moral-ethical values are to be contrasted with radical religious and religious-political ideas and a conception about the state and ethno-religious and confessional attitudes is to be worked out as soon as possible as well as put the basis of multilevel system of religious education.
It was also voiced an opinion about intervention of foreign powers: this opinion was expressed by the Islamic party of Azerbaijan which was closed by the state in 1995, motivating its decision by the fact that it was also financed from Iran. At present the party is working half-legally.
In spite of the fact that Azerbaijan’s population and, in particular, Baku as a whole is the carrier of secular traditions, however the regions are to the certain extent religious. It is not by chance that some candidates for presidency were aspiring to attract attention of these very circles.
The leader of “Party of Great Creation” Fazil Ghasanfaroghlu suggested canceling quite a painful issue of prohibiting wearing headscarves in Universities and making special uniform for Muslim students without any Iranian, Turkish and Arabic elements. According to him, the state must display maximum patience to religious people and not only let them pray in mosques but also allow the sound of azan to be heard out of them. Another candidate for presidency, Gulamhusein Alibeyli, considered the lack of Islamic factor in presidential elections quite strange. According to him, human rights in Azerbaijan are violated, which is proved by the fact that police make people shave or forbid to pray.
Meanwhile, the director of the Institute for Peace and Democracy in Baku, the author of the monograph “Islam and Azerbaijan” Arif Yunsov is sure that the role of Islamic factor in the Azerbaijani society and the country’s political life rises day by day. He thinks that in reality there is a struggle between two ideologies in the country – heidarism and Islamism. Meantime, the government doesn’t have any special policy towards religion: It just applies methodology adherent to Soviet epoch.